Just read a post at Airbag Industries about anti-design (a.k.a. non-design, anti-marketing-design). A lot of sites seem to be going this way and it seems silly that we’ve finally reached the point with internet speeds when we can design sites that have a bit more weight, such as Flash and high quality images and people are cutting their sites down to text. The thing is it’s not nice text either, it’s ugly. And that’s the aim.
To me this seems like a lot of fashions that i don’t understand (metros, emos, etc.). I don’t understand why they would want to make such a statement. The excuse is that people don’t need a nice and pretty website, they just need usability and content. I like my cake and i’ll eat it too thanks. Why have one and not the other? So would you like a beer that was easy to open and consume but tasted like something that came out of a camals behind?
Anyway, a comment someone posted to the anti-design post on Airbag Industries was that Google sports a clean and effective design. More like a dull and boring throw together. The comment reminded me of something i read a little while ago about the the Google design. I would have to agree with that one, the result of the looks great, it’s far more clean and is much more effective.